HSBC CEO urges staff to embrace AI amid plans to cut 20,000 jobs

When your boss tells you to embrace the technology that might replace you, the appropriate response is somewhere between nervous laughter and updating your LinkedIn. That’s roughly the situation facing tens of thousands of HSBC employees right now.

CEO Georges Elhedery is pushing the bank’s workforce to accept the reality of artificial intelligence reshaping their jobs, even as the company moves forward with plans to eliminate approximately 20,000 positions globally. That figure represents about 10% of HSBC’s entire workforce, concentrated mainly in non-client-facing roles.

The pitch: adapt or get left behind

Elhedery has been remarkably candid about what’s coming. Generative AI, he’s acknowledged, will both destroy and create jobs at the bank. The destruction part is already underway. The creation part requires something the corporate world loves to talk about but rarely executes well: retraining.

According to HSBC’s 2025 Annual Report, the bank plans to shift toward scaled delivery of generative AI and integrate it deeper into core processes by 2026.

The 20,000 job reductions are expected to unfold over a three-to-five-year period. Not all of these cuts will come from outright layoffs. Some will happen through natural attrition, others through not replacing departed employees, and some through business sales.

What’s actually getting automated

The cuts are targeted specifically at non-client-facing positions. Think back-office operations, compliance processing, internal reporting, and the kind of repetitive analytical work that large language models are increasingly capable of handling.

What this means for the banking workforce and investors

Cutting 10% of a global workforce is a massive operational bet that the technology will deliver enough efficiency gains to justify the disruption.

The discussions around these cuts reportedly began before the Middle East conflict escalated, suggesting this is a structural decision about the future of the business rather than a reactive cost-cutting measure tied to geopolitical uncertainty. Cyclical cuts get reversed when conditions improve. Structural cuts driven by technology adoption tend to be permanent.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.