Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has put a bullseye on some of the biggest names in American business, and Elon Musk’s sprawling empire is near the top of the list.
On March 31, the IRGC identified 18 US companies, including Tesla, Apple, and Microsoft, as potential targets for retaliation amid escalating tensions in the region. The corps accused these firms of facilitating US and Israeli actions it characterized as “terrorist operations,” and set an ultimatum: possible actions against their regional facilities by 8 p.m. Tehran time on April 1.
Starlink in the crosshairs
Among the Musk-linked assets drawing Iran’s attention, Starlink stands out. Iranian state media labeled the satellite internet service a “legitimate target” due to its operations in Bahrain, Kuwait, and the UAE.
The IRGC’s warning came with a chilling escalation formula. “For every assassination in Iran, a US company will be destroyed,” the corps stated, tying its threat list directly to what it views as covert operations on Iranian soil.
No attacks on Musk-related assets or any of the other named companies have been confirmed. The threats appear to be part of a broader pattern of rhetorical escalation rather than a response to any specific provocation by Musk or his businesses.
Tesla, SpaceX, and Musk’s other ventures were not singled out for any unique grievance. They landed on the list alongside legacy tech giants and other major US corporations, suggesting this is less about Musk personally and more about Iran casting the widest possible net across American commercial interests in the region.
The geopolitical backdrop
The timing matters. US-Iran tensions have been ratcheting upward, with both sides engaging in a familiar cycle of provocation and counter-threat. The IRGC’s decision to name specific companies, rather than issue vague warnings about American interests, represents a notable shift in rhetoric.
Starlink’s presence in the Gulf is relatively recent but strategically significant. The service provides satellite-based internet connectivity that can bypass traditional telecommunications infrastructure, a capability that Iran has previously criticized. Its operations in Bahrain, Kuwait, and the UAE put physical assets within range of Iranian military capabilities.
Notably, in November 2024, Elon Musk met with Iran’s UN ambassador, where discussions focused on potential avenues for de-escalation of ongoing geopolitical tensions.
What this means for investors
For Tesla shareholders, the direct exposure is limited. Tesla’s Middle Eastern business is a fraction of its global revenue, and the company doesn’t maintain massive manufacturing facilities in the Gulf.
Starlink’s situation is more nuanced. SpaceX is privately held, so there’s no public stock to sell in a panic. But the service’s expansion plans in the Middle East could face headwinds if the security calculus changes for host countries. Bahrain, Kuwait, and the UAE all maintain complex relationships with Iran.
For crypto markets specifically, there’s no direct connection between the IRGC’s threats and digital asset prices. Iran’s well-documented history of using cryptocurrency to circumvent sanctions is a separate track entirely from its military posturing against American commercial targets.
The IRGC’s deadline of April 1 has passed without reported incidents. The absence of confirmed action suggests that investors should treat this as a risk factor to monitor rather than a reason to panic.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

2 hours ago
1
















English (US) ·