Strategy CEO Phong Le details rationale behind Bitcoin sale, calls it a systems test

Strategy, the company formerly known as MicroStrategy, sold Bitcoin for the first time in over three years. CEO Phong Le framed the move not as a retreat from the company’s legendary accumulation thesis, but as a controlled experiment to make sure the plumbing still works.

The sale involved just 32 BTC, offloaded between May 26 and May 31 for approximately $2.5 million at an average price of $77,135 per coin. That’s roughly 0.004% of the company’s total stash.

A deliberate test, not a policy reversal

Le described the transaction as a process validation exercise. The company wanted to confirm that its internal systems for executing Bitcoin sales operated correctly end to end. His verdict was concise.

“Everything works.”

During a May 2026 earnings call, leadership indicated the firm would adopt a more flexible stance on selling Bitcoin. The key qualifier: any future sales would only happen under conditions that enhance Bitcoin per share, the metric that matters most to shareholders who bought into the thesis.

The numbers tell the real story

As of June 1, 2026, Strategy held approximately 843,706 BTC. By June 8, following additional purchases, that number climbed to 845,256 BTC. The company didn’t just replace what it sold. It bought roughly 1,550 more coins on top of that.

Strategy is targeting an accumulation goal of 1 million BTC. At current holdings, that means the company still needs to acquire roughly 155,000 more coins.

To fund continued buying, Strategy has been exploring new capital instruments. One recent addition is STRC, a yield-bearing security designed to attract a different class of investor, those who want Bitcoin exposure with some form of income attached.

Le has laid out specific criteria for when selling Bitcoin would be acceptable going forward. Two scenarios qualify: supporting dividend distributions, and improving financial metrics when the stock trades below its net asset value. In both cases, a sale only makes sense if it leaves remaining shareholders with more Bitcoin exposure per share than they had before.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.