Fed rate hike bets trimmed after weak July jobs data

Market participants have adjusted their expectations on the trajectory of U.S. Federal Reserve rate hikes following the release of disappointing jobs data for July. The report showed an addition of just 73,000 jobs, well below market forecasts, prompting a reevaluation of potential monetary policy moves. The bond market now indicates an 80% probability of a rate cut in September, a significant increase from the 40% likelihood priced in just a day earlier. This shift suggests that the labor market’s cooling may lead to policy easing, contrary to previous expectations of rate hikes.

Current market pricing for a rate cut by the Federal Reserve’s September 2026 meeting remains low, with a 5.5% probability of a YES outcome. Despite this, the recent data has contributed to a reassessment of future monetary policy, with markets gradually moving away from the likelihood of rate hikes. Key indicators such as unemployment rates and economic growth projections will be closely monitored as they could further influence the Fed’s decisions in the coming months.

Key Takeaways

• Market participants appear to be reducing expectations of Federal Reserve rate hikes after weaker-than-expected jobs data.
• Recent developments suggest an increased probability of a rate cut in September, reflecting a dovish shift.
• Pricing indicates a reevaluation of potential monetary policy moves due to indications of a cooling labor market.

What to Watch

Watch for any statements from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell or the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) that might further clarify their stance on interest rates. Upcoming economic indicators, particularly those related to inflation and employment, could provide additional insights into the Fed’s policy direction. Any unexpected changes in these data points could influence market expectations and impact the likelihood of rate adjustments.

Get prediction market intelligence as a structured API feed. Early access waitlist.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.