OpenAI considers giving US government a 5% stake to blunt AI criticism

OpenAI is in active discussions with the Trump administration about handing the US government a 5% equity stake in the company, a move that would represent one of the most unusual public-private arrangements in modern tech history.

The stake, valued against OpenAI’s estimated $852 billion private valuation, would be structured as a donated equity position rather than a traditional purchase. In English: the government wouldn’t pay for it. It would simply receive shares, roughly $42.6 billion worth of ownership, for free.

A public wealth fund, not a regulatory power grab

The concept traces back to OpenAI’s April 2026 policy paper, which proposed creating a sovereign-style investment vehicle called a Public Wealth Fund. The idea is straightforward on its surface: as AI reshapes the economy, the financial gains shouldn’t accrue exclusively to Silicon Valley shareholders.

The stake would not come with active governance involvement. The government wouldn’t get a board seat or veto power over product decisions. It would be a passive financial interest, designed more to share upside than to steer the ship.

Discussions have expanded to include Anthropic, suggesting this could evolve into an industry-wide framework rather than a one-off arrangement between Sam Altman’s company and Washington.

Why now, and why this approach

The discussions reportedly began in early 2025 and have intensified through June 2026.

What this means for investors and the crypto market

The $852 billion valuation figure itself deserves scrutiny. That’s roughly the GDP of the Netherlands, concentrated in a single private company. A 5% government stake at that valuation would make the US government one of OpenAI’s largest equity holders overnight, without spending a dime of taxpayer money.

For crypto markets, Sam Altman’s involvement with Worldcoin, the digital identity and cryptocurrency project, creates a bridge between OpenAI’s trajectory and the digital asset space.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.